What we think is easy to eyeball, though, is incredibly hard to identify in data. Quantitatively, what does gentrification look like? A change in median income in a neighborhood over time? In racial demographics, real estate investment, housing values, coffee shops per capita? If gentrification is the gradual displacement of working-class residents by upper-income ones, should we look at changes in the share of professional workers, or in residents with college degrees? What about shifts in the social character of a place? Can you quantify the loss of mom-and-pop corner shops in favor of national chains, or the end of cheap carry-out replaced by high-end dining?
These questions get at a fundamental problem with one of the most controversial (and fuzzy) concepts in urban policy: Even researchers don’t agree on what “gentrification” means, let alone how to identify it. (And this is to say nothing of its even more problematic derivative, the “gentrifier.”)
At Gay Realty Watch, we look for news to share with you about the gay real estate market – both lgbt real estate news and news specific to gay and lesbian real estate meccas.
If you have a gay real estate story that you’d like to share with us, contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org